ESPN FC’s Craig Burley, Nedum Onuoha and Frank Leboeuf address Liverpool’s 3-0 win over Crystal Palace, led by goals from Virgil van Dijk, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Fabinho.
✔ Subscribe to ESPN+:
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube:
Camisetas Brasil Encuentra aquí todos los fichajes de fútbol, altas, bajas y rumores: Mercado de fichajes ✓ Noticias fichajes ✓ Fichajes La Liga
Ederson got the benefit of a horrible call, so Jota should be cheated. That is an argument from the shillest of shills.
To be fair to Kevin Friend, I think a very strong case can be made that this is a foul anywhere else on the pitch. Jota was going towards ball, even if he was controlling the ball poorly. Defender/goalie was moving away from ball, and played man and got no ball. Case closed.
Now, for me, that is not one to whistle IN THE BOX because of the poor last touch. But if we are appealing to special unwritten rules in the box, then how wrong were the referees, really?
How about the Jota stonewall penalty against Spurs that wasn't given and this Jota penalty given a month later? Better example of the inconsistency than anything else.
What about Odegaard's foul on Fred that was awarded a penalty against Arsenal
To stop all this subjective opinions I got an idea. Once a 'foul' is committed they should have 10 refs at VAR each giving their verdict whether its a penalty or not and majority votes decide the outcome. If its 5 yes and 5 no then it gets given to the public to decide, which they call in and vote yes or no penalty and majority decides the outcome. Then by next week hopefully half time would have started by then.
??????
clear pen. var and ref said it clear. goal miss the ball an slip in joto, even if joto tray to safe his live with his right leg.
Penalty decision was in the 89th minute ?
What is palace keeper plan as in modern football if you touch apposing player you gonna get fouled and he chatters into jota penalties are given for less contact
Who cares this wood of bin a gd topic if the game would of end 2 3 not 3 1
"fair play to Jota for getting the penalty". This shows how people think about sport these days. His team did get an advantage because he CHEATED and the officials could not see that. As I watched at home, I immediately said "no penalty" and was pleased to see that the ref agreed, but then, OHH no VAR has suggested the ref goes to the screen and give a penalty. I played soccer for decades, this was not a penalty, all the ex players who are pundits say it was NOT a penalty only the ref and the VAR ref seems to think it was a penalty. There must be something wrong here!!
Big deal…..ref.decision….how many time does ref…got it right….luck on red side…wrong to right
Not a f PK . Day light robbery
VAR & Referee to decide the final decision..so just accept it..that's all.. everyone have different mindset to judge the situation & they can said anything base of their thinking..in football match, referee & VAR are the one to decide the final results not us.
The FA trying to keep the league title interesting. Can the referres and VAR be THAT incompetent?
It is not a penalty but it's okay. Liverpool were denied a penalty against Spurs. So it balances up.
I’m a die hard Liverpool fan. But, that was absolutely not a penalty. It is so obvious that Jota after the ball goes out of reach looks to the keeper and runs into the keeper. And then falls down dramatically. That is embarrassing. Just wow.
Hahahah, it was a funny penalty, no pen 100%
Jota lost the ball, yes but he wanted to give it a chase why did goalkeeper Guaitar impede his movement???
Another error….
Even though I'm a Liverpool fan that is no way a penalty for 2 reasons. 1. Jota didn't have control of the ball and 2. Jota runs into the goalkeeper and they just collide no foul or trip so no penalty.
Helen Keller even seen it wasn't a fkn penalty ??